#Anatomynotes: A temporal content analysis of anatomy education posts on Instagram.

Social media platforms such as Instagram are becoming increasingly popular sources for students to access anatomy educational resources. This review used content analysis to examine posts under the hashtag #anatomynotes and is the first to map the characteristics of anatomy education posts on Instagram and determine any temporal changes. Sample posts were gathered from April 2019 and April 2021 and categorized according to the technical format, purpose and author credentials. Engagement was recorded in the form of likes and comments. Overall, posts depicting illustrations remained the most popular format within both time periods. Three-dimensional models saw an increase in popularity with a 62.5% rise. Students remained the most common author type throughout and increased further in 2021 by 25%. Clinician authors and posts focusing on clinical education also increased in 2021 by 17.9% and 227%, respectively. Humor-based posts saw the greatest increase among the post purposes, with 1000% more recorded in 2021. Engagement overall saw a decline with notably significant reductions in average likes per post among all text-based posts (-72%, p < 0.0001), all illustrative posts (-51%, p = 0.0013), and a decline in the presence of comments among all text-based posts (-65.1%, p = 0.0158). These findings highlight that Instagram is a popular platform for facilitating near-peer teaching while increasingly providing a space where students and clinicians can interact. Additionally, it highlights the benefits of the platform for visually focused learners. However, future research should seek to determine whether Instagram can facilitate deeper learning and have an impact on academic and clinical performance.

Examining the WFME Recognition Programme at 10 years.

BACKGROUND: In 2012, the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) evaluated and formally recognized the first agency in its Recognition Programme (RP). The RP was developed to review accrediting authorities in response to a 2010 policy by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) to require international medical graduates (IMGs) seeking to practice in the U.S. to graduate from an appropriately accredited medical school. By the end of 2022, WFME had recognized 33 accrediting bodies and received applications from another 16, which accounted for over three-quarters of the world's medical schools. In 2023, WFME leadership changed hands, and the ECFMG will take its first steps toward implementing its Recognized Accreditation Policy. APPROACH: In this article, we look back at the genesis of the RP and describe its first decade as informed by the limited existing peer-reviewed literature and the emerging activities of accrediting agencies that could have significant implications for the quality of medical education internationally. CONCLUSIONS: The rapidly growing influence of WFME on medical education worldwide has largely occurred without significant awareness or scrutiny, and there is a need for the WFME to demonstrate greater transparency, proactively engage its stakeholders, and support research and evaluation.

Reconsidering a Global Agency for Medical Education: Back to the Drawing Board?

Issue: The World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) was established in 1972 and in the five decades that followed, has been the de facto global agency for medical education. Despite this apparently formidable remit, it has received little analysis in the academic literature. Evidence: In this article, we examine the historical context at the time WFME was established and summarize the key decisions it has taken in its history to date, highlighting particularly how it has adopted positions and programmes that have seemingly given precedence to the values and priorities of countries in the Global North. In doing so, we challenge the inevitability of the path that it has taken and consider other possible avenues that such a global agency in medical education could have taken, including to advocate for, and to develop policies that would support countries in the Global South. Implications: This article proposes a more democratic and equitable means by which a global organization for medical education might choose its priority areas, and a more inclusive method by which it could engage the medical education community worldwide. It concludes by hypothesizing about the future of global representation and priority-setting, and outlines a series of principles that could form the basis for a reimagined agency that would have the potential to become a force for empowerment and global justice in medical education.

Is West Really Best? The Discourse of Modernisation in Global Medical School Regulation Policy.

Phenomenon: In 2012, the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) established a recognition programme to evaluate medical school regulatory agencies across the world, in response to a new U.S. accreditation policy. Given the predominantly Western origins and Eastern impacts of the WFME programme, this article deconstructs tensions in the programme using postcolonial theory. Approach: Critical discourse analysis examines the intersections of language, knowledge, and power relations to highlight what can or cannot be said about a topic. We employed it to delineate the dominant discourse underpinning the WFME recognition programme. We drew on the theoretical devices of Edward Said, whose work is foundational in postcolonial thinking but has not been widely used in medical education scholarship to date. An archive of literature about the WFME recognition programme dating back to 2003, when WFME first released global standards for medical education, was analyzed. Findings: In the globalization of medical school regulation, the discourse of modernization can be conceptualized as a means of holding knowledge and power in the West, and enacting this power on those in the East, playing on fears of marginalization in the event of non-engagement. The discourse allows these practices to be presented in an honorable and heroic way. Insights: By uncovering the representation of the WFME recognition programme as being modern and modernizing, this article explores how such conceptualisations can close off debate and scrutiny, and proposes further examination of this programme through a lens that recognizes the inherent inequities and geopolitical power differentials that it operates within.

How should we do equity, diversity and inclusion work in health professions education?

This is an editorial for the special collection on equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) for MedEdPublish. In this article, the guest advisors of this collection first reflect on the paradoxes in EDI in health professions education (HPE), then on the importance of recognising the existence of multiple authenticities on the basis of different contexts and settings, and finally encourage authors and readers to reflect on their position on the continuum of EDI work. They conclude the editorial by outlining the direction they wish to set for articles in the collection.

Enhancing family medicine training to build capacity in Pakistan: a call for action.

A high-performing, integrated, primary healthcare system is essential to achieve universal health coverage (UHC) goals and improve health indicators. There is enough evidence that healthcare is cost-effective with significantly better outcomes in countries where primary care is delivered through trained family physicians. The concept of "Family Practice approach" is relatively new in developing countries like Pakistan, where majority of basic healthcare is provided by doctors without a formal postgraduate training. The intention to adopt this approach in primary care has increased in recent years in an effort to attain UHC, yet implementation requires a paradigm shift with intervention at multiple levels. There is an opportunity to learn from better developed primary care models for example in UK and Australia to develop a pragmatic and collaborative approach to develop the specialty of family medicine in primary care. This calls for academic interventions at multiple levels, such as mandating family medicine inclusion in undergraduate medical curricula, and ensuring quality of postgraduate training by investment in developing primary care sites for training, curricula, assessment, and quality assurance structures. Encouraging medical students and general practitioners to pursue a post graduate qualification in family medicine would also require promoting family medicine as a worthwhile career and developing a higher esteem for qualified family physicians than the conventional GPs in public and private sector healthcare institutions. These interventions would help evolution of locally grounded solutions to improve the quality of primary care, hence the health outcomes of the larger population of Pakistan.

Implementation of virtual OSCE in health professions education: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) has been widely used in health professions education since the 1970s. The global disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic restricted in-person assessments and medical educators globally sought alternative means to assess and certify students and trainees to meet the acute demand for health-care workers. One such solution was through virtual OSCE (vOSCE), which modified traditional in-person OSCE using videoconference platforms. This meta-ethnography sought to synthesise qualitative literature on candidates' and assessors' experiences of vOSCE to evaluate whether it may have a role in future assessment practices. METHODS: In June 2022, we systematically searched PsycINFO, Medline and ERIC for peer-reviewed qualitative and mixed-methods articles that described candidates' and assessors' experiences of virtual OSCE in health professions education. Of 1069 articles identified, 17 were synthesised using meta-ethnography. RESULTS: The final synthesis represented 1190 candidates and assessors from faculties of medicine, dentistry, nursing, pharmacy and osteopathy. We developed our findings into four key concepts. 'Strengthening confidence in a virtual environment' highlighted attempts to overcome and mitigate concerns associated with transitioning from in-person to virtual assessment. 'Understanding the scope of use as an assessment' reflected on the suitability of vOSCE in assessing various skills. 'Refining operational processes' emphasised the technical challenges of implementing vOSCE and impacts on accessibility and resources. 'Envisioning its future role' considered the applicability of vOSCE in the climate of rapid development in telehealth. CONCLUSION: This meta-ethnography highlighted that although vOSCE was primarily considered a temporary and crisis response, candidates and assessors recognised positive, as well as negative, consequences of the transition towards them. Moving forward, medical education policymakers should carefully consider the extent to which elements of vOSCE could be incorporated into assessment systems, particularly in light of the rise of telehealth in clinical practice.

English Language Medical Schools in China: An Analysis of International Medical Graduates Practicing in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: From 2006, the Ministry of Education in China has approved universities to provide undergraduate medical training in English, targeting fee-paying international students. Students on these courses can face challenges in their clinical training, particularly in the domains of communication and professionalism. This study examines the proportion of doctors qualified from such medical schools who are currently listed on the UK medical register. METHODS: The UK General Medical Council register of medical practitioners was searched to identify doctors qualified from 33 Chinese medical schools who provide education in the English language. RESULTS: As of February 2022, 502 doctors whose primary medical qualification is from a university offering English language education in China were registered on the UK medical register. Four hundred twenty-five (84.7%) of these doctors were aged 39 and under, approximately double the proportion of doctors in this age bracket overall. Three hundred forty nine (69.5%) were staff grade and associate specialist doctors, 109 (21.7%) were doctors in training, 36 (7.2%) were on the General Practitioner (GP) register, and 20 (4.0%) were on the specialist register. Among doctors in training, the most common specialty areas were in general practice and psychiatry that are both facing recruitment shortages in the UK at present. CONCLUSION: A small but significant number of graduates whose medical training was in the English language in China are practicing medicine in the UK. These doctors are in younger age groups than the overall medical workforce, and are less likely to be in training, and specialist or GP posts. Among those in training, a high proportion are in GP and psychiatry training and could contribute to alleviating UK medical workforce shortages. Policymakers and educators should be mindful of the growing numbers of doctors qualified from these schools, and the additional support they may require considering the unique training environments they have encountered.

Respect and reflexivity: international education partnerships in primary care.

The UK general practice model has been described as the 'jewel in the crown' of the National Health Service and is widely respected and emulated around the world. In recent years, there has been a particular interest in the UK approach to primary care medical education, including at undergraduate and postgraduate levels, leading to a number of international education partnerships designed to draw on the best of UK experience and expertise in this area. Drawing on the limited academic literature in this area, and the authors' personal experiences of working across many international partnership projects with countries around the world, this article reflects on the central importance of respect and reflexivity when engaging in such work. A respectful approach relies on a genuine and deep curiosity for the local context, and a desire to empower partners to build their own solutions that are contextually authentic. A reflexive approach, meanwhile, relies on those engaging in partnerships to understand themselves as 'invited guests' and to remain mindful of current and historical power differentials and inequities when framing their engagement, looking both inwardly and outwardly as they conduct themselves. As primary care education around the world develops and expands, there may be a greater role for international partnerships and it is critically important that those engaging in such partnerships bring a thoughtful and scholarly lens to this work.

Editing the editors: Aims and priorities of health professions education journals.

PURPOSE: Although health professions education (HPE) scholarship has flourished in recent decades, the influence of HPE journals has received little attention. This study examines the editorial policies and priorities of leading HPE journals. METHODS: Fourteen HPE journals with the highest impact factors were reviewed for their editorial aims, scope, intended readership, and priority topic areas. Text from journal websites was coded using thematic analysis. RESULTS: 10/14 HPE journals included in this study were linked to regional or national education societies. Two focussed predominantly on medicine, one on dentistry, one on nursing, one on nutrition, and the remaining nine on general HPE. Although journals differed in their projected aims and proposed readerships, four overarching editorial themes were identified: (1) methodological and theoretical rigor; (2) impact on practice; (3) global relevance; (4) advancing knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Leading HPE journals share a number of priority areas and principles, implying some cohesion and consensus amongst the HPE scholarly community. These journals prioritise impact at the level of individual practitioners. Given the importance of policy level change in the development and reform of HPE around the world, the relative lack of focus on policy impact in HPE journals is worthy of further exploration.

Altruism or nationalism? Exploring global discourses of medical school regulation.

BACKGROUND: Although medical school regulation is ubiquitous, the extent to which it should be based on global principles is unclear. In 2010, the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) announced that from 2023, overseas doctors would only be eligible for certification to practise in the United States if they had graduated from a medical school that was accredited by a 'recognised' agency. This policy empowered the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) to create a recognition programme for regulatory agencies around the world, despite a lack of empirical evidence to support medical school regulation. METHODS: This study employs critical discourse analysis, drawing on the theoretical perspectives of Michel Foucault and Edward Said, to identify discourses that enabled this 'globalising' policy decision to take place. The dataset includes a series of 250 documents gathered around three key events: the Edinburgh declaration by WFME in 1988, the first set of global standards for medical schools by WFME in 2003 and the ECFMG ruling about medical school accreditation in 2010. FINDINGS: Two discourses, endorsement and modernisation, were dominant throughout this entire period and framed the move to globalise medical school regulation in terms of altruism and improving medical education worldwide. A discourse of resistance was present in the earlier period of this study but faded away as WFME aligned itself with ECFMG after 2010. Two further discourses, protection and control, emerged in the later period of this study and framed the ECFMG ruling in terms of nationalism and protecting American interests. DISCUSSION: This study proposes a new conceptualisation of the relationship between ECFMG and WFME in light of the apparently contradictory policy motivations of altruism and nationalism. It goes on to consider the implications of this association for the legitimacy of WFME as an organisation that represents all of the world's medical schools.

Adoption of Problem-Based Learning in Medical Schools in Non-Western Countries: A Systematic Review.

Phenomenon: In recent decades, medical education practices developed in Western countries have been widely adopted in non-Western countries. Problem-based Learning (PBL) was first developed in North America and it relies on Western educational and cultural values, thereby raising concerns about its 'lift and shift' to non-Western settings. Approach: This review systematically identified and interpretively synthesized studies on students' and teachers' experiences of PBL in non-Western medical schools. Three databases (ERIC, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE) were searched. Forty-one articles were assessed for quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist and synthesized using meta-ethnography. The final synthesis represented over 5,400 participants from 18 countries. Findings: Findings were categorized into three different constructs: Student Engagement, Tutor Skills, and Organization and Planning. Our synthesis demonstrates that medical students and teachers in non-Western countries have varied experiences of PBL. Students engage variably with PBL, consider knowledge to be better acquired from authoritative figures, and deem PBL to be ineffective for assessment preparation. Student participation is limited by linguistic challenges when they are not native English speakers. Teachers are often unfamiliar with the underlying philosophical assumptions of PBL and struggle with the facilitation style needed. Both students and teachers have developed modifications to ensure that PBL better fits in their local settings. Insights: Given the significant adjustments and resource requirements needed to adopt PBL, medical school leaders and policy makers in non-Western countries should carefully consider possible consequences of its implementation for their students and teachers, and proactively consider ways to 'hybridize' it for local contexts.

Breaking Boundaries: Interdisciplinary Workshops to Write Integrated Medical School Assessments.

Although integrated medical school curricula have been widely adopted and examined, there has been comparatively less attention on the challenges associated with developing integrated assessments. Working with medical schools around the world, we have developed a writing workshop format that unites teachers from different disciplines to produce integrated assessment items.

Hyperglobalist, sceptical, and transformationalist perspectives on globalization in medical education.

PURPOSE: Globalisation has been hotly debated in recent decades and has seemingly had a profound impact on medical education. This review synthesises the medical education literature using key perspectives from globalisation theory by Holton (Making globalisation). METHODS: Holton (Making globalisation) recognised three key perspectives in globalisation theory-hyperglobalist, sceptical, and transformationalist. This article critically reviews the literature on globalisation in the field of medical education using this theoretical framework. RESULTS: Hyperglobalist and sceptical perspectives dominated early periods of medical education literature on globalisation, projecting it either as a mainly positive or mainly negative force, respectively. Most forecasts grounded in these perspectives have not materialised in medical education policy and practice. Since 2010, the volume of scholarship about globalisation has increased and has been predominantly transformationalist in perspective, recognising a reality that has both positive and negative consequences. CONCLUSIONS: The medical education literature has mirrored the broader social science literature, in moving over time from hyperglobalist and sceptical positions, towards a 'third wave' of globalisation thinking that is transformationalist. Medical education practitioners and policymakers should be mindful of these perspectives and trends as they navigate the opportunities and challenges presented by globalisation.